Is it possible that blogging hurts your chances of getting published elsewhere? That depends.
The ordinary opinion piece, like this one you’re reading now, can only help, always assuming you write well. Even if you only have 30 followers, that’s 30 more than would ordinarily see your ideas expressed so fully otherwise, and potential publishers can get a very good overview of your writing skill with a click of a mouse. Since opinion pieces tend to be transient, there’s little danger of “using up” good ideas, so you’re not competing with yourself.
For more imaginative writing, however, it’s a different story. That’s because most publishers consider your work, whether it’s fiction or poetry, to have already been published if you’ve posted it on your blog, and almost none are open to work that’s already published elsewhere. Most writers would like to be published by someone else, if only to validate their work. Although it’s true that self-publication has lost some of its stigma these days, there still remains the issue of whether anyone else whose opinion you might value thinks your work is worthwhile.
So, if a blog is considered a publication by the majority of editors, who want only unpublished material, where does that leave the poet or short story writer? You could simply consider your blog just another publication to which you submit your work. That’s fine, but you know it will get accepted there, because the editor is…um…you. As a result, you will tend to send what you consider your best work elsewhere, either by design or unconsciously. Your blog becomes a repository for second-rate work, stuff you have low confidence in, or that has been rejected elsewhere. In the best case, it will have experimental material that you feel will have little chance of exposure elsewhere. In this blog, I often post pieces which blur the boundary between fiction and essay, or which I think are simply too short to be considered by magazines and journals, although I have to admit, that seems to be all I write in the way of fiction anyway. Still, I don’t feel I’m competing with myself.
For me, the problem is with poetry, which I post on my other blog, Exile’s Child. Lately, I find myself neglecting Exile’s Child, because if I write a poem I think very highly of, I tend to send it off to a journal. Rather than posting just leavings on the blog, I have to sit down and write specifically for it, which leaves me questioning the wisdom of not sending the result elsewhere, or, if I don’t think it’s good enough, of posting it on the blog. I like to think I have enough sense not to post second-rate material, but we are all very good at self-deception when it’s required, aren’t we?
I would love to hear your thoughts on this subject, especially if you happen to be an editor.
It’s so frustrating though. Everything you read about writing and how to drum up business tells you to develop a blog, as publishers like to see that you know how to play the game and build a following! Although I agree with using a blog for a test run. Nice and thoughtful post, and I like your easy writing style. Reading it was like a hot knife through butter, if that makes any sense.
Thanks, I often think of myself as a hot knife! 🙂
(Takes her gloves off and slaps him across the face!) As you were!
If something is accepted for a journal, it is usually only on a first rights basis. So, work someone else validates can be re-published on your blog at a later date to maintain the quality level.
Of course, your hypothesis that good poems go to journals and others don’t relies heavily on acceptance being based purely on quality, rather than other factors.
It’s an internal debate, really, and not necessarily dependent on logic. Of course there’s a large element of luck involved, but quality is still the most important factor, or there’s little point reading at all, is there?
True. However, several studies have show readers and editors have different criteria and thresholds for “quality”.
I would consider the probability of getting published versus putting your work out there in the first place. If it is for personal pleasure and satisfaction follow the latter – for the former if it does not get accepted after a reasonable amount of goes and time then you have your answer! As the fella above says getting published is as much to do with luck as talent. The dangr is that everything becomes a circular though process! I am pleased to follow you by the way!
There is indeed the satisfaction of putting it out there, but there’s also that niggling doubt, isn’t there? Or maybe it’s that damned indelible mark on my soul the nuns used to go on about. 😉
Nuns – where would we be without them?